The Spoony Experiment

Avatar Review (12-19-09)

by Spoony on December 20, 2009 · View Comments

My brother and I return for a hotly-contested debate about James Cameron’s long-awaited sci-fi epic “Avatar!”

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 542 comments }

Joon_Studios June 10, 2010 at 12:15 pm

I agree. But I thought the story was good. It was it's own original take on Dances with the Wolves. The universe was well crafted. The characters were great too. My mom cried at the I see you part at the end. The effects were good but I didn't need effects to say this was the greatest movie ever made. Also, Ello Lopes Ribero, District 9 was good and maybe in my top 5 favorite films but it was nowhere near as good as Avatar. Plus comparing Avatar to Transformers is like comparing The best condition of platinum to the smelliest piece of terd in existence.

theforetoldlegend June 15, 2010 at 1:03 pm

I agree with what you said, but I perfer Avatar to 2012

Brendan James Griffith June 19, 2010 at 9:59 pm

I was dragged to this one by a girl. The 3D version, no less. And I swear, there was more 3D in the trailer for Alice in Wonderland than there was in the entire movie. I felt completely cheated out of my money, and I rarely ever feel cheated out of my money when I leave a theater because if I see a movie in theaters, I will go out of my way to FIND good parts of a movie to point to so that I can say I wasn't cheated. In Avatar, there was no such luck.

Jason Siddle June 20, 2010 at 10:11 am

Before i watch this video i just wanna say you spelt Pocahontas wrong.

That is all.

13secondspastmidnight June 21, 2010 at 5:57 pm

I just wanted to put my two cents worth in (like every single other person who ever comments on a video… yes my hypocrisy is very evident), in that I do agree that this is recycling the same torn-down broken message in a very obvious way. However although I think the story is mundane and SO over-done that it is ridiculous and insulting… this is still the best execution I have ever seen of this particular story (I mean, even the mention of 'the Last Samurai' made me want to slit my wrists (that movie still haunts my nightmares *shudder*)). The visual effects were just that good that I did actually like this movie, despite the fact that the story and characters were preachy and overdone. And I did treat it entirely like an animated movie… because well 99% of it is animated and when you've created an entire movie out of CGI, it's a little silly to be complaining that the movie has CGI in it.

In the end I just absolutely loved the visual effects to the point where I pretty much ignored most of the movie and just sat back to appreciate the artistry. I mean fluorescent plants, floating mountains and a tree with a nervous system? You bet it's ridiculous and unbelievable! But I thought (this is just my opinion though) that it was beautiful, and the effects were well done.

Yeah, but anyway, great discussion and nice job dissecting this movie.

Addendum: Also, I do believe that a really REALLY big chunk of why this movie is so popular is because – and I say this as an Australian who has cousins who live in America – most of the world REALLY DOES NOT LIKE AMERICA. It's just a fact. I'm not saying that this dislike is justified or not *coughbushadministrationcough*, but it is true that I know a lot of people who just felt really really good seeing an “evil” american corporation with obvious “evil” army expys being taken down by a bunch of giant blue smurfs with stones and sticks. I'm sorry, but that was just awesome.

I mean, you better believe that if you guys hadn't voted Obama in, this movie would have been a much bigger hit simply because 95% of all movie theaters around the world would have had people cheering like at the fucking Roman colloseum.

13secondspastmidnight June 21, 2010 at 6:01 pm

Hi! I'd just like to point out that Avatar had giant blue smurfs with sticks trying to beat up oppressive humans with guns … and district 9 had giant black cockroaches with laser rifles trying to beat up oppressive humans with guns.

I personally liked both movies equally… although the premise of both has been done many many times before.

13secondspastmidnight June 21, 2010 at 6:09 pm

Lord of the rings does have flying mountains… they're just not on middle earth. And, to be fair, Avatar does establish an entirely different environment and evolutional scale and, in fact, a world with an entirely different application of conventional physics And they do mention it. Yeah, it's implausible but I've suspended my own sense of disbelief for a lot less.

31337garak June 29, 2010 at 12:52 pm

You have a nice Siskel and Ebert thing going on with your brother. You should definitely do more movie reviews together. :)
I have to say, I enjoyed the movie on a purely visual level, but the story left me feeling bludgeoned to death with propaganda and I was thinking this is Fern Gully all over again, but I liked Fern Gully more.

Adam Kholladi-Ezagouri July 7, 2010 at 7:39 am

Spoony man, I agree with you 100%…on every level. Having said that, your brother did not deserve to be burped on lol

Giovanni Ribisi was awesome. The only truly awesome and convincing thing in the entire film.

Bill Newman July 10, 2010 at 11:58 am

Avatar was a carbon setting copy of a Russian novel.

mihr July 12, 2010 at 2:28 pm

james camerons next movie: Titanic 2, jack's revenge (in 3d)

Katie July 13, 2010 at 11:23 am

“'e're gunna kill some injuns!!!”
“YEAHHH!!!”
…that's great.

Zach Sommer July 16, 2010 at 3:25 am

I can understand what you're brother touched on when he was talking about the message of the film. You have seen Dances with Wolves, Pocahontas, etc. The thing is those movies came out in the 1990's. History has shown people need to be CONSTANTLY reminded of these things.

I promise you there is going to be some dimwitted 15 year old who up until this point has been so close minded that when someone communicates this message to him it'll be like an epiphany. Sad as it is someone who saw this movie needed to have this message hammered into their heads.

A movie as simple, blatant and shamelessly anti-Iraq, or whatever this movie acts like it's making a statement about, is what is needed to communicate to the dull minded American Audience. Keeping in mind that Cameron is not of the US.

Shantal Figueroa July 16, 2010 at 4:17 pm

The thing is that I don't think that most people are dimwitted 15 year olds that have been closed minded until they see Avatar. This movie was marketed as having universal appeal, and it really doesn't. And hey, a lot of Americans are fucking tired of Iraq too but it's not the American people who make all military decisions.

The thing is that when your movie tries to convey a message you have to do it in a subtle yet firm way. If you wanted to have an anti-Iraq war film, then make a film about how badly the Iraqi people are suffering or something. Don't just try to hammer it in a cheesy way , where your villains are redneck Marines that act in an overly-evil manner. American audiences won't identify with that at all and a lot of us just ended up rolling our eyes at the pretentiousness.

Shantal Figueroa July 16, 2010 at 4:22 pm

Half the movie was scenery porn, that's why it was so long. Haha.
I agree with the whole white guilt thing- it's silly and racist and offensive to EVERYONE, not just white people. I mean, the part that offends a lot of people is also the fact that a white dude comes in and is instantly better than the natives at everything they do and because they're the main character they're always right and always the best. ALWAYS. Also the idea that one culture is just inherently better than another culture is just offensive in and of itself. (In Avatar the Navi were portrayed as having the best culture EVAAAR. And everyone who didn't agree with this was a bad guy.)

I hated the preachiness of the movie as well. It doesn't add anything new to the table, and it's just beating a dead horse. Yes, the world hates America. We fucking know. It's not going to change how we go about our daily lives. I also have a problem with movies that portray the military as this EVIL entity and that every soldier is an evil mother fucker who wants to kill all the savages no matter how innocent they are in practice because the U.S. military doesn't work that way. People in the U.S. military come from different backgrounds from all around the country, and they're human. This means that they are capable of good, and capable of evil. They aren't giant cartoons running around shooting everything in their way. That is NOT how to write a good villain and it's not how real life works.

The good things I have to say about Avatar are this, though:
Yes, it was interesting to look at. The last fight scene was pretty awesome. Some of the scenery porn was sweeping and cool to look at.
And James Cameron knows how to sell female characters who aren't necessarily walking fanservice machines. The females in this movie were pretty badass. I love how Sigourney Weaver filled the role of the sarcastic, gruff mentor. That female pilot was pretty cool too.

Harrison July 17, 2010 at 3:40 pm

Here is this movie in one word: Macguffin!
The defining aspect of a MacGuffin is that the major players in the story are (at least initially) willing to do and sacrifice almost anything to obtain it, regardless of what the MacGuffin actually is. In fact, the specific nature of the MacGuffin may be ambiguous, undefined, generic, left open to interpretation or otherwise completely unimportant to the plot. (Examples might include money, victory/glory, survival, a source of power, a potential threat, etc….or something entirely unexplained.)
MacGuffins are sometimes referred to as plot coupons (especially if multiple ones are required, as in this movie) as the protagonist only needs to collect enough plot coupons and trade them in for a denouement.
And our first of many Macguffins in this creatively uninspired cinematic holocaust? Unobtanium, which is brought up once for about 5 seconds near the beginning of the movie and is, of course, hardly (if ever, I kept zoning out) brought up again.
Just take it at face value folks! All you really needed to know was that they were there for…some reason. Which is exactly all you really learn about the supposedly precious metal. Seriously, if you missed the first 5 minutes you don't even know why they're there. Not that it matters. They could have just said “Our mission is classified,” never uncover it and it would have been exactly the same movie! And there you have it: an explanation towards the lack of creativity about just the first scene that took longer to write than the entire first act! This movie is stupid on a stick!

James Mcnamee July 26, 2010 at 2:54 pm

unobtainium really i mean really what the hell

Benjamin July 27, 2010 at 10:18 pm

I might suggest that the preachy anti-racism or anti-imperialism morals will stop being necessary when people stop acting that way (and make no mistake, there's still plenty of racism and imperialistic tendencies in North America and around the world). Not that I completely disagree with you–in most cases, as in Avatar and Ferngully, it seems like the writers don't really understand the issue at hand, and are just regurgitating stock morals with no depth–but I think it's a small price to pay to get masterpieces like To Kill a Mockingbird or Schindler's List.

I wasn't a huge fan of Avatar, even if the preachy morals weren't the biggest problem for me. It wasn't the preachiness that bugged me as much as the fact that it was such a predictable and simple plot, marketed as being an original and innovative movie. Like Noah, I think it's too long and, at best, an okay movie that didn't deserve the hype that it got.

I don't really have a problem with the use of CGI in movies, but I don't find it impressive either. It seems to me that it should just be a medium for art and design, not as the main feature of the movie. EVERY movie has CGI nowadays, and good technology doesn't guarantee that the art will be visually appealing (Avatar looked okay, but I didn't think it was anything to phone home about), and it certainly doesn't make up for a second-rate story. Perhaps if I had seen it in 3-D I might have liked it better, just because the effects might have distracted me from the derivative story.

maduce July 28, 2010 at 5:50 pm

Heh. Yeah I agree with you. I'm just saying if Avatar was an anime, people would claim it's highly derivative of Princes Mononoke. It certainly was a far superior story for all the reasons you mention. And thank you, I'm glad I wasn't the only one not turned on by the Na'vi.

commander672 August 2, 2010 at 6:02 pm

I disagree with the end battle scene being good. ITS BULLSHIT! Why? Becouse all the while these guys are fighting, there's a glareing plothole in their battle plan: The Daisycutter…IS IN A MOTHERFUCKING SPACESHIP! Which means that they could simply fly the caarft in the thinner upper-atmoshpere of the planet and drop it from their where the Na Vi can't retaliate. Use your computers and calculate wind speed and simple trajectories, factor in the floating mountains…And DONE! You've got a quick and easy daisycutter surprise, and if the Na Vi try to intercept the bomb, they'll get their bones crushed by the explosive's massive acceleration. And since the sensory corroption they mentioned in the zone clearly doesn't effect light, you could even use modern electronics to make things more accurate.

And why did they land troops on the ground? The Na Vi have no AA cababilities beyond their dragons! Those men could have been put to better use gaurding the base!

Duelist August 3, 2010 at 6:48 am

I wont touch on the message, or the preachiness, or the similarities, because all of that is discussed everywhere, but I will say one thing: I disagree with The Spoony one about the ecology. I loved the ecology. As a scifi nerd, I am so tired of seeing ecologies that arent alien. Yes, they have alien species, or plants, but the basic ecology is earthlike to some extent. This? This is the most Alien ecology I've seen on film in a long time, and so radically different in so many ways from ours. I loved the light up plants, because thats shows a fundamental difference to earth ecology, and it provides a wonderfully simple answer for why so many animals in this movie are bioluminescent. Its as simple as, “If it don't glow, its a dark spot on a light up background” which is the exact opposite of earth. At night, if its bright, it stands out. On Pandora, at night, if its not bright, it stands out. And something that simple shows an alieness to this planet that I adore.

Emerson Simmons August 3, 2010 at 11:49 am

and while george did break that rule..he did kinda learn from it. and did better in episode 2 and 3 (in my opinion)
but unfortunately i dont think james will either learn or even care.

Emerson Simmons August 3, 2010 at 11:50 am

he likes yor…so of course he can suspend disbelief.

Emerson Simmons August 3, 2010 at 12:01 pm

yeah whats up with that?
what science did they have to make that seem plausible in anything?

Emerson Simmons August 6, 2010 at 11:22 pm

not to mention…armor piercing rifles vs ….sticks…..go figure. the plot says so.

note: jake forgot to tell them they just wanted the rocks..which are never explain why they are valuable…..thats already a few plot holes right there…heck the rocks being more valuable than the aliens is like 7 plot holes.

Emerson Simmons August 6, 2010 at 11:30 pm

i dont care what movie it is…put you cant have floating mountains on any planet….with or with out water falls…
and the pony tail usb crap is just insulting to the name of SCIENCE!!!!

Emerson Simmons August 6, 2010 at 11:33 pm

well i agree if they explained it would have been easier to except…but if anyone knows any science or simple physics…it will never happen..unless chuck norris decides to juggle.

Emerson Simmons August 6, 2010 at 11:34 pm

preachy white guilt environmentalist movies make me want to chop down trees….so they actually lose and i feel better for wasting money to see this crap…

Badoshke August 10, 2010 at 9:43 pm

They do explain it, or at least vaguely. They say at least a few time the 'rocks' are a very good energy source, and can power things used on earth so well, it would be worth millions (or maybe billions). Why are they so good? How are they used? They don't go into that, but really, does it matter? They could say there's machinery that extracts a certain part of this material which is compatible with and used with electronically device that can power things, and it wouldn't add much to this failure of a movie, even if it was better. And the rocks being 'more valuable' than the aliens isn't a plot hole at all unless you don't understand their mind set or predicament.

Badoshke August 10, 2010 at 10:16 pm

I basically agree that Avatar was terrible, but not necessarily for the same reasons. The message the movie presents doesn't really bother me that much. What does bother me is the fact that it's basically spoon fed to you, and has no originality whatsoever. At least if it took an original view, or made you think about what it was saying, then I may have liked it better, but it didn't. It took the “Hi, I'm a mainstream movie and here's everything you need to and want to know about me and then some” approach, which I don't respect in any movie, overused message or not. The only thing this movie really does have is visuals, which don't last very long and isn't something a movie should stand on. The first time I saw it, sure, they were pretty great, but the second time I saw it, they barely amused me, and I noticed how bland and empty this movie really is.
Also, Pocahontas is another movie is completely rips off, if it wasn't said already.

Anonymous August 11, 2010 at 4:43 am

They do explain it, or at least vaguely. They say at least a few time the ‘rocks’ are a very good energy source, and can power things used on earth so well, it would be worth millions (or maybe billions). Why are they so good? How are they used? They don’t go into that, but really, does it matter? They could say there’s machinery that extracts a certain part of this material which is compatible with and used with electronical devices that can power things, and it wouldn’t add much to this failure of a movie, even if it was better. And the rocks being ‘more valuable’ than the aliens isn’t a plot hole at all unless you don’t understand their mind set or predicament.

Anonymous August 11, 2010 at 5:16 am

I basically agree that Avatar was terrible, but not necessarily for the same reasons. The message the movie presents doesn’t really bother me that much. What does bother me is the fact that it’s basically spoon fed to you, and has no originality whatsoever. At least if it took an original view, or made you think about what it was saying, then I may have liked it better, but it didn’t. It took the “Hi, I’m a mainstream movie and here’s everything you need to and want to know about me and then some” approach, which I don’t respect in any movie, overused message or not. The only thing this movie really does have is visuals, which don’t last very long and isn’t something a movie should stand on. The first time I saw it, sure, they were pretty great, but the second time I saw it, they barely amused me, and I noticed how bland and empty this movie really is.
Also, Pocahontas is another movie it completely rips off, if it wasn’t said already.

Anonymous August 14, 2010 at 4:04 pm

Alien ecology? These are all Earth creatures bashed together with no sense of reason! Here’s a four-armed monkey! Here’s an evil flamingo! Here’s a rhino-peacock! Here’s a lizard dog! Here’s a really big lizard dog! Here’s FUCKING DINOSAURS! The cat people’s holy tree is a fucking weeping willow! My aunt has one in her backyard! And how is being lit up supposed to make you harder to see, even in a bright environment?

Anonymous August 16, 2010 at 4:16 am

You’re very dismissive of your brother, Spoony. Be nice.

Anonymous August 16, 2010 at 4:32 am

Some cultures are better than others. For example, Western Civilization > Taliban oppression.

Anonymous August 17, 2010 at 9:52 am

i know, and i feel so bad for him Q.Q

Anonymous August 17, 2010 at 10:06 am

Titanic 2: Resurrection

A team of decepticons go into the ocean with a stolen piece of the all spark and resurrect Jack

Ashely Lutz August 17, 2010 at 10:49 am

I know corporate heads and people in power are generally assholes. I know we fucked over native americans. I know we need to defend the environment and not destroy it. But I don’t need a shitty movie to tell me any of that.

Anonymous August 17, 2010 at 10:59 am

terrible critic!? at least he elaborates on his views and doesnt just say some one dimensional comment like “breath taking” you sir are a dumb ass

Ashely Lutz August 17, 2010 at 11:14 am

I’m even more sick of these kind of movies, because they’ve just stopped trying to mask it. It’s always flat out, “These people are assholes and these people are paragons of kindness.” It’s even more irritating now that people try to denounce environmentalism based solely on how terrible and preachy these movies are.

Smaragdos August 19, 2010 at 12:23 pm

Visually spectacular.Worth watching.But the story was the standard generic scenario.Nothing original, many stereotypes and illogical forced evilness. Frankly despite the effects it was really forgettable….

Anonymous August 29, 2010 at 5:02 am

Well, I don’t know if this was mentioned in the previous over 500 comments, but here it goes. The mountains are possible, given their explanations. Seriously, you can even look it up in youtube. Ok, first, they want unobtainium because it is a super condutor, super conductors do crazy stuff, including, providing you have enough of it, make mountains fly. How? Well, it’s almost rocket surgery :P, but it works, you can look through youtube, and the wikipedia for superconductors, it is cool, and they said the mountais where made of super conductors, provided with the magnetic field of pandora, you know, like earth has one too, the superconductors oppose the variability to the magnetic field change…. my mermory is a bit rusty on that, but it works close to that, and since they waste no energy with heat and such, they won’t ever fall :P

Comments on this entry are closed.

blog comments powered by Disqus