The Spoony Experiment

Eragon

View Comments

Double Dragon

A Review by Noah Antwiler

The worst criticism I've ever received over my Gamer's Rant column was from my friend's eight year-old son, who upon overhearing my thoughts on the Harry Potter series stood up, looking very hurt and said "You're a big dumb meanie, and you have a big dumb nose." Stunned by this brutal and unexpected tongue-lashing, I gawked at the kid in terror while the entire table celebrated my total pwnage and gave him running high-fives. I don't think I've ever been so accurately described in every piece of hate mail I've read. He even zeroed-in on my huge nose, the snarky runt.

I asked him what his favorite movie was, and being a kid (who usually have a new favorite movie every week) he proudly declared it was Eragon with an expression that said he didn't care if I had twenty years and a hundred-twenty pounds on him, if I started bashing that movie, he was coming across that table for my throat. So I did the rational thing: I went home to totally savage it on the Internet!

Saphira ponders - not for the first time since
they've met - that Eragon is bite-sized.

But first I actually had to see Eragon, and after I had, I saw why the poor kid liked it so much. I loved Star Wars when I was his age, too. And man, does someone need to show that little guy the holy trilogy, stat, because few movies have enraged me as much as Eragon has. As a big dumb meanie with a big dumb nose, I've made my journalism career on tearing down fandom. It may not seem like I hold much sacred, but deep down in my black heart there are still some sacrosanct movies. There are still some things I will not allow, and Eragon does just about all of them. Why?

Because Eragon is, bar none, the most complete and shameless rip-off of Star Wars ever xeroxed. Not even Turkish Star Wars stole as brazenly from the dang series. I mean, sure, they stole X-Wing battle footage, but at least they still managed to come up with somewhat original characters. You read that correctly: Eragon is a worse movie than Turkish Star Wars, a film that features a guy wearing golden gloves machine-gun punching Robbie the Robot to the heroic strains of the Indiana Jones theme, then feeds a man in a bright red gorilla suit his own leg.

See if this sounds familiar: a humble farm boy discovers that he possesses a hidden power and finds himself hunted by an evil overlord who once betrayed a noble order of knights charged with the protection of freedom and justice. Along the way he meets a wise old mentor who gives him a powerful sword, encourages the young man to develop his magical talents, helps him save a princess in the warlord's dark fortress, and sacrifices himself to save the boy. The movie ends with an air battle after the bad guys track down the hidden stronghold of the rebellion.

And that's not even half of it.

Everything in this movie is stolen. Even Eragon (whose name is so blatantly suggestive it makes me want to punch kittens) seems to have stolen Luke Skywalker's haircut. He's even a whiny little brat who lives with his uncle, a shaggy fellow that gets butchered by urgals (read: stormtroopers). He has a brother named Roran who you might suppose has something to do with the movie, but he doesn't.

The movie begins with an elven princess stealing a "stone" (read: the Death Star Plans) from Darth Malkovich, and through sheer chance it ends up in Eragon's back yard. It just so happens that the stone is actually an enchanted dragon egg, and amazingly, Eragon is destined to be the chosen one who will ride this dragon against the empire. Through magic (read: bad writing) the dragon reaches full maturity in about four hours and is born with a better vocabulary than most adults I know. They bond quickly, and Eragon learns to ride the dragon by flying through a ravine ("Just like Beggar's Canyon back home!") and masters magic (read: the Force) through the tutelage of Brom, a former dragon rider and your average mentor character who never survives to the third act of the film.

It's a good thing Brom brought his dragon saddle. Seriously, that's how they explain it. Brom packed his dragon saddle.

Brom (read: Obi-Wan Kenobi) is played by Jeremy Irons, an otherwise excellent actor who seems to be psychically drawn to tremendously bad fantasy movies. At least he manages not to embarrass himself here like he did in Dungeons & Dragons, and in fact is probably the best part of the movie. Anyway, it doesn't seem like there's any real secret to magic; simply knowing the ancient Elvish words for things is enough to evoke their power. It sort of proves what John Constantine said about magic: "Any cunt could do it."

"Your father wanted you
to have this when you were
old enough, but your uncle wouldn't allow it."

Darth Malkovich is rather upset over the theft of his dragon egg, and tasks his evil shade Durza to bring it back. Durza, a powerful wizard, in turn sends the nefarious Urgal assassins to kill Eragon. Man, there's an awful lot of subcontracting going on with these bad guys, and when the Urgals fail we have to sit through two phases of the defeated minions reporting to their boss about how they failed. I mean, why would the evil warlord even bother keeping the magical dragon egg around if it's the only thing that can destroy him? And why don't either Malkovich or Durza go out themselves to kill Eragon? It's not like either of them have anything better to do than sit on uncomfortable thrones and brood. Why wouldn't he spend an hour to get on his fully-grown black dragon, fly down to Eragon's village and turn the whole thing into a field of scorched glass with his breath weapon?

My favorite part of the movie is where Malkovich explains to Durza why it's important to kill Eragon quickly to prevent the resistance from having any hope because he rules his nation through fear. "Fear will keep the local systems in line! Fear of this battle station!"

The real shame is that Malkovich is the best actor in the movie, and despite being the main villain he's barely in it. His work was likely finished in a day, so most of the heavy villainy is done by Robert Carlyle in a ratty Bozo wig who somehow managed to find a worse role than the Bond villain in The World is Not Enough. His character is a complete idiot, sending riders in black (you might say they're... Black Riders) out to kill Eragon over and over again, and yelling at them when they screw up when he could easily burn his face off any time he wants. In fact, when he successfully manages to lure Eragon into a trap using the elven princess (Leia) as bait, he inexplicably allows the heroes to escape when he has them at his mercy.

Along the way to the rebellion, Eragon enlists the aid of a charming rogue (read: Han Solo) to guide them through the mountains. The resistance is a group of warriors who have made camp in a cave behind a waterfall, led by Faramir of Gondor—I mean, Ajihad, played by Djimon Hounsou in some truly hilarious hair extensions. It looks like the movie is officially out of Star Wars to steal, so now it's running down the checklist of Lord of the Rings plot points and stealing them, too.

Durza realizes that Eragon has entrenched himself in the stronghold of the resistance and rallies the Urgals with a dramatic speech that's written and filmed almost word for word, shot for shot exactly like Saruman's "You do not know pain, you do not know fear" speech to the Uruks. And that's not the only shot Eragon steals from other movies. I remember one scene when a forlorn Eragon stands outside his uncle's house watching a dramatic sunset, carbon copied from A New Hope. I don't make this accusation lightly. There's coincidence, there's homage, and there's outright theft. Someone should have been sued over this.

Kane from Command & Conquer now sets
his sights on Middle-Earth.

I haven't even mentioned how poor this movie is in every technical regard. The dialogue is about as subtle as a beer fart, with characters repeating things we already know several times and vocalizing the completely obvious with nobody else around. I can barely pick out the most embarrassing line from this travesty, although the first one stands out in my mind: "I suffer without my stone."

I also haven't mentioned the dragon much, an inexcusably phony-looking animated wyrm named Saphira, voiced by Rachel Weisz. Saphira shares a telepathic link with Eragon, because if there's one thing that I really want to see Ed Speelers do, it's pretend to think really hard for half the movie.

If you're wondering why Eragon doesn't just command his dragon to breathe fire all over his enemies, she can't. Brom explains that she's "not yet old enough to sustain a flame," but considering Saphira grew into a ten ton clawed death machine in a matter of hours, "not yet old enough" translates to "wait until morning" because the next day she's laying waste to an entire army with her napalm breath.

It's also maddening at how quickly the movie progresses, an unusual complaint for me to make, but it's true. It feels like the Cliff's Notes version of an epic movie. There's no character development to speak of. There are simply good guys and bad guys, and if any character is given a backstory, it's usually in the form of awkward dialogue shoehorned inappropriately in between action beats, like "Seize him! He is the son of the traitor!" Ironically, the only characters the movie dwells on. Brom and Eragon's brother depart the narrative completely. Why would they waste time developing the background and motivations of characters who don't show up for the rest of the movie? Maybe they show up again in the sequels, but as a single movie it completely fails to stand on its own.

It's one of the worst movies of all time, not only in terms of its poor quality, but because of its total creative bankruptcy. When I safely say that Dragonheart was a masterpiece in comparison, it should scare you to your marrow. Its only value is in devising a "Spot the Rip-off" drinking game, or maybe if you've got some weird Sienna Guillory fetish. Even then, I'd take Resident Evil: Apocalypse over this cheese, and I would rather wear a sandpaper thong on a treadmill than watch a Resident Evil movie.

Still, something good came out of all this. I spend so much of my time being a big meanie that sometimes I forget how much I really appreciate Star Wars, and yes, even George Lucas for at least being something of a storyteller. The meanie in me says that Lucas could probably be accused of stealing the plot for that from half a dozen samurai movies, but the fan in me still doesn't care if he did. They didn't have hyperdrive in Hidden Fortress!

Besides, I got to totally blast an eight-year-old's favorite movie in a magazine he'll probably never read. Isn't that what it's all about?

  • jrnault77
    These books are awesome. The movie is a predictable lets make money off of good books and fall short. He is not even close to being the dragon rider that he will become.
  • gamegoddess
    I watched this movie before I even picked up the books, and even then I knew it was mediocre at best. I mean, Saphira's design was pretty cool and Jeremy Irons was a refreshing addition to the movie. But I hated the movie so much and my dad (who thought Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull and Revenge of the Sith were the best movies to hit cinema since Citizen Kane) gushed about it so much, I couldn't bring myself to read the books. But really, they are a lot better. This movie was attrocious...
  • kewlimp
    I can put this into terms thats easy to identify. I was rereading the White Wolf Changling book and mention the exact way that this movie moves. Its a sequence of events called the Heros journey. A lot of MOVIES, BOOKS, and GAMES are based off of this exact path of the journey. Even Star Wars follows the the formula of the Hero's Journey. That is what we are comparing, then not even Star Wars is that original. I have seen older Japanese samurai movies that have a similar plot( I'm talking about 50-60s old).
  • Elliott Dee
    I really enjoyed the book but when i went to see this steaming pile i actually thought i had fallen asleep for half an hour it moved so fast and some of of the cast dont even fit the descritions given in the book and dont even get me started on the urgals because they look like cavemen in the movie with viking helmets when they are ment to be imposing BEING DIRTY IS NOT SCARY BAD FILMS ON THE OTHER HAND ARE!
  • Rubbav1
    HERO WITH A THOUSAND FACES
    Campbell

    Read it! Please!

    All fantasy is based on mythology, thus all fantasy stories are inherently the same. Some are better at hiding it than others but it's true. That doesn't mean there couldn't be good ones and bad ones, to question the source material is just plain pointless.
  • Ellie Sparks
    I actually sat down to watch this crap not long ago, because it was on and I was bored, and I wanted to see if the movie makers could out-terrible the books. Congrats, boys, your trophy will arrive in 8-10 business days. By the end I was almost in physical pain, and my mom was wondering about my angry yells.

    To read the result of my torture, just google Ellie Sparks and livejournal. It should come up, under the title "Extra Masochism Points for Me!"

    P.S. Dearest Spoony, I'm game for a Spot-the-Ripoff drinking game if you are! I'll be drinking Irish coffees. What's your poison?
  • John Christopher
    I hav to agree on both sides of the dilema we obviously hav here. Yes the entire plot is a complete copy of starwars lol but on the other hand I do agree with dexter a few comments back although paloni clearly took his story from misalaneous(srry don't know how to spell, olny 16 lol) books and movies that made lots of money, he does give the story his own style of writing even if he doesn't know what he's talking about half the time with his metaphors of mass destruction he still gets a point across and for a young writer this book is the beginning although I don't really see him writing anymore but when I write a story in English class I always steal the plot from starwars, who doesn't lol. Paloni just took it to the next level and published his "ninja-like" plagerism
  • Nebadon Adams
    Interestingly enough, if you ever want an insight into Lucas' own "inspirations" read the Foundation series by Isaac Asimov; in Second Foundation you have a character named Han and a character named Bail. Hyperspace, as far as I can tell, comes completely lifted from Foundation. The Second Foundation has mental powers that they use to manipulate the various Empires that oppose their rule. Still, Lucas had enough foresight to add eastern ideas and a samurai-tech sensibility to distance himself from Asimov.
  • mysticalcreatures
    ive read the Eragon novels and they're alright. kinda bland and not especially original, but kudos to the writer for designing a couple new languages them. but i hated the movie. not just for its stupidity, but its outright inaccuracy. Brom looks thirty, Eragon is too damn dashing to be a simple farmboy, the RaZak look like ninjas with flies all over their faces, and the Urgals (big leathery guys ith huge horns) are FSGs (fat sweaty guys). thank you for bashing this movie.

    ps
    you know, i never noticed the star wars similarities until now.
  • Eric
    I thought impossible for the movie to out-terrible the books. I mean between the lack of originality, terrible purple prose and incredibly flat characters, they couldn't make such a bad movie could they?

    Of course they could, and I'm personally glad. Now we never have to listen to hype over the adaptation of a terrible teenage-aimed novel hmm? Oh wait...
  • Lewis
    when i saw this in theatres i thought it was awesome.ironicly enough(if you can consider this ironic)i was about 8 or 10 years old when i saw this as well, and now that you've showen my the errors of my ways i am declined to say that this movie is the most uncreative, low budget, pile of crap i've every seen! also i'd like to point out; how dare Eragon rip of star wars, one of the greatest and one of my most favorite movie franchies' of all time!
    P.S. george lucas and steven speilberg are awesome! :)
  • Dexter
    to be honest, I get the feeling that there is a lot of unnecessary group hate for Paolinis' books here. The only similarities between Star Wars and the books is the Hero's Journey and even then Eragon strays from the Hero's Journey at many times. Plus, the same could be said of all fantasy books to some point in that they all use the Hero's Journey.

    The books were perfectly fine, but the movie made me laugh it was so bad.

    And yes, when you cut out almost all of a story, it tends to feel rushed, unlike the book itself which had great pacing, something that run of the mill fantasy books don't have.
  • Matthew
    Actually,
    in the second book we are told that magicians can kill entire legions of soldiers when they aren't protected by other magicians.
    Now, have that in mind when you are watching a scene where the bad guy is trying to kill someone but fails.

    And the books get more and more stupid.
  • King of Gondor
    My brother lent me the book and said it was great, I tried reading it that night and the next morning I contemplated beating him with it till blood came out his ears.
  • Kewl Imp
    Alright, placing the star wars overlay over the MOVIE does work very well. However it is nothing compared to the books. The movie was WAYYYY to fast and didn't show any of the real training and the explaination of magic and the way it works. Which isn't fully explained until the second book. I agree with you Noah, it does feel like Cliff Notes for an epic movie which is really sad. They changed so much for time but failed to produce something worth while. In fact, I am not allowed to watch the movie because my wife does not want to hear be bitch about how bad they butchered the movie.

    One thing I want to say about this however, find me a movie where they show a complete bond between two souls and have them remake the movie. I want to say the bond between Eragon and Saphira is much deeper than talking with his mind.
  • WiredFolf
    I actually saw this movie with an open mind. Having not read the book or dismissed it before stepping into the theater. Sadly yes, it's terrible. I was more disappointed by such great actors like Malkovich, Irons, even Hounsou, being so poorly under used. That and the editing was beyond terrible.

    I tried reading the book a few months later. I gave up trying to get into it after page 135. Not to say it's terrible, but rather its just bland. Bland, uninspiring, trying nothing new and taking no chances. It's the vanilla ice cream of fantasy story telling. While many like vanilla, I prefer more toppings on my dish.
  • Somewhat
    Then there was the board game... God, the instruction manual alone is a chuckle and a half. Try playing the game. Yeah, it's a GAME, but so is moving quarters across your floor. I suppose it's not the worst board game idea, but I played with a 10-year-old who thought it was repetative and dumb. Her words.

    Ugh... And I hear there's a VIDEO GAME, too? Will not play. Though, it looks more mediocre than anything else.
  • Xzienne
    SamSkye, you need to find some actual writing if you think Paolini is any good as a writer. I tried to read it, and it looked like my throwaways from primary school.
  • Never read the books, never saw the movie. If you make a bad movie, that's fine, but ripping off another movie (especially Star Wars) just puts you on a whole new level of sadness. How hard is it to come up with something original? Apparently the world has become FULL of lazy writers that would rather remake something then create a new story. Granted, there isn't really anything "new under the sun" anymore, but you can at least TRY!

    And how does this happen anyway? If I made up a story that was a direct ripoff of star wars and LotR and tried to sell it off to some studio or publisher, i'd be laughed outta the room....and rightly so. Yet, this thing gets made? And i'm sure it made the author quite a nice amount of money as well. Bah...i've got a headache just thinking about it.
  • Colin
    I think it's hilarious that we are into October 2009, nearly THREE YEARS after the movie came out, and people are STILL commenting on this review. Ah, the wonders of an extremely polarizing series of books. I personally enjoy the books for what they are: a very derivative but still relatively interesting story with slightly derivative but mostly unique and intriguing characters in a highly derivative but still workable setting written by a guy in his late-teens/early 20s with a big ego who occasionally grasps at greatness but is mostly in over his head. THE MOVIE, however, took the WORST and MOST DERIVATIVE parts of the first book (in a way that would make sequels entirely unworkable) and meshed them all together in one big horrible mess, which was rightfully decimated by Spoony. It's probably for the best that Spoony clearly didn't know that the movie was an adaptation of a book written by a teenager, because even a mention of that would have opened up an even bigger can of worms than he already has (SIXTY-SIX COMMENTS!).
  • Link
    I dont see how everyone hated these books so much, personally they are some of my favourite books. Reading this review though i can see the similarities to Star Wars. I still dont understand why this series of books is so hated.

    The movie sucks ass, does everything wrong, loosely follows the story and I nearly cried while watching it.
  • Randy
    Hey, isn't Eragon suppose to be a trilogy? What ever happened to the sequel?

    Good thing I stood away from this shit.
  • C-chuck
    The movie, although I never saw it, I heard to be bad. However, Paolini rips off nearly everyone in his books, sometimes nearly word for word, and should have all his books burned.

    That's right. BURNED.

    And I really don't say that lightly, I have entire shevles of horrible Star Wars novels.
  • Bal
    I have to admit the books were a guilty pleasure of mine, but the movie was laughable.

    While reading Paolini's work, I would often wonder if the boy looked through a thesaurus to decide which words to use. And while there are often complaints of cliched scenes in a story, one must remind people that they are cliched for a reason... they worked most of the time. Still I have to give the books their due by admitting the characters were different, the bond between Saphira and Eragon took a longer time to grow, and we were allowed to see more of Eragon's family life and interaction with the rest of the villagers. However in ways like the movie Roran, the cousin of Eragon by the way, after he leaves for apprenticeship isn't spoken of for the rest of the said book. Though he does come back in the second book and grew to be my favorite character, what girl wouldn't love a completely human character who beats people with a hammer? Still the book has better pacing than the movie and the characters are given a little more flesh.

    The movie on the other hand was horrible.
  • Levi
    quote LauraRiddle:I’ll have to see if he progresses any in Brisingr. However, after that whole “super-kick ass elf body” BS, I have a feeling he might be regressing in Brisingr.

    He does NOT get better with Brisingr. Instead, he spends about ten pages summarizing the "plot" of the previous two books (in a rather inaccurate way; for example, suggesting that there is any kind of political complexity to the dwarfs and the elves, when the summary itself just says "the elves hid in the woods and the dwarfs hid in the mountains"). Then, you get the first chapter, where you are reminded of how much of an asshole Eragon and his cousin are and how useless the dragon is, as well as how awful Paolini's prose is (he fits in about six metaphors/similes IN THE FIRST FREAKING PARAGRAPH!). You also get the characters expositing the exact same stuff that was in the plot summary, just in case it wasn't enough for someone who's probably READ the other two books. And it is incredibly BORING. I honestly looked at my watch after reading just fifteen pages of that dreck (not counting the summary) and found an HOUR had gone by. You then gey the second chapter, where the tone shifts ridiculously from "serious" to "humourous" to "thoughtful" and so on, before ending with Eragon deus-ex-macinaing away an injury Roran had, which I had honestly forgotten about (it never troubled him in the last book, and was probably mentioned once) and it obviously won't be troubling him any more after that.

    Okay, rant is over now (largely by virtue of not having read any further; I can't WAIT to get to the part where Eragon brutally murders an unarmed and terrified soldier in cold blood with his bare hands though).
  • Dexter
    The Books were actually good and not rip-offs of Star Wars. If you take time to read them, the story has a totally different feel than this piece of decaying **** that they call a movie. They actually do other things, the plot progresses at a nice pace throughout the book, and the characters are well developed. I can't even say that the book was a Star Wars rip-off, because so many of the characters had way different personalities and flaws than those in Star Wars. Not to mention that even in the beginning, it's not very similar to Star Wars due to many, many things that happen in the book and were excluded from the movie.

    Seriously. When my friend and his went to go see this with me, his dad thought this was a Star Wars spoof, for goodness's sake. And I was just laughing the whole time, it was such a terrible desecration of the Inheritance Cycle.
  • kleine_kat
    I need only say one thing.

    Rachel Weisz.

    Good god, it's about as bad as casting Scully, sorry, Gillian Anderson, as the voice of the big wolf in Princess Mononoke.

    She's not a dragon! She's a librarian!
  • fufu
    This is the movie the star wars 1-3 haters wanted the prequels to be.
  • adsfrasdfasf
    I hated this movie!
  • Engblad
    @ Bilal Popp. It's true that Paolini ripped alot from "Memory, Sorrow and Thorn" (I really appriciate Williams books) and I probably dont even need to mention that Star Wars was a huge inspiration for Paolini when he wrote Eragon... but even though I dont want to enjoy his rippfest it is a decent book and I think Eldest and Brisingr is a positive evolution from it.

    Luckily Paolini didn't take anything from Eddings because in that case nothing could've hindered my judgement!
blog comments powered by Disqus