The Spoony Experiment

The Crow

View Comments

The Crow

A Retrospective by Noah Antwiler

Imagine a darker reality, a world of looming gothic architecture and sharp, jagged shadows. The cities are all slums and combat zones, the streets look like toilets, and the world is constantly peed on from God on high. People are pale and generally not nice at all. It's a world as written by Stabbing Westward and The Cure. No candy and gumdrops here, folks, we're talking about the movies adapted from James O'Barr's comics about an undead avenger, brought back to life by a magic crow to set all the wrong things right. Put simply, they're about whitefaced angst-ridden goths in eighty cows' worth of black leather who seek justice by killing every last grimy creep who was loosely connected with his murder. My mommy always told me "two wrongs don't make a right," but if I'd listened to her I wouldn't be the colossus of journalism that I am today. No, I'd have become a stupid doctor who helps people and makes lots of money. But I suppose a movie about a dude who returns from the dead and runs around forgiving everyone until they repent wouldn't have been as exciting. It does bring up an interesting idea for a movie about Jesus though...

Pilate: "Any last words?"

Jesus: "I'll be back."

It's interesting to note that in the Stairway to Heaven television series, killing was verboten for The Crow. If he did kill anyone, they returned as a similarly indestructible dead guy known as a Snake that's harder to get rid of than the new World of Darkness books. Now that we're all on the same page of gothness... gothitude... gothicity... let's talk about those kooky Crow movies.

And so the emo movement was born.

The Crow

Rockerboy Eric Draven had everything going for him. A sweet axe, a sweeter girlfriend, and a swanky loft in the city (as gothic landscapes go). Unfortunately, the gangsters in the apartment downstairs get sick of the loud music, so they kill everyone and throw Eric out the window. If there's one thing that makes animal spirits of vengeance angry, it's watching a happy couple defenestrated, so Draven claws his way out of the grave reborn as The Crow. The cynic in me thinks that's a little sexist. Shouldn't Draven's fiancée Shelly have more reason to seek retribution since she was both raped and murdered? I think the Crow spirit just chose Eric because he had a cool black outfit in the closet already.

The first movie was a rousing success, despite its many flaws. It's not very well-written, and much of the dialogue is rather dry. Most memorable for me is the absurdly angry bug-up-his-butt police lieutenant whose sole purpose in life is to make the good, honest cop's life miserable by shouting things like "You're too involved in this case, Albrecht!" or "The mayor's been up my ass! I've got a goddamned vigilante killer out there knocking off scumbags left and right!" or "You've got 48 hours to solve this case, Albrecht, or you're suspended!" The movie also seems somewhat unfairly balanced, as there's nothing that can harm The Crow unless you kill the actual bird (which makes him mortal again). This robs the movie of any tension the fights might add, and becomes a series of graphic murders in which Draven toys with his former tormentors and gives them a painful (and usually explosive) terminal comeuppance. The movie is at its best when considered artistically, and it allows the music to tell its story.

Second verse, same as the first.

The Crow: City of Angels

The sequel wasn't long in coming, considering the success of the first. It didn't take that long to write, either; all they did was Xerox the first movie's script and slap a new title page on it. Not a good move, considering most of that movie was carried by the magnetic personality of Brandon Lee and not the script. The story's the same as before, only now the villain is a sadomasochistic drug lord shaman (yes, really) with a terrible nose for business. He brutally executes one of his lieutenants for destroying a bad batch of heroin-- a decision the man should have been rewarded for. After all, bad product kills customers and costs him long-term profits! Once again the villain here manages to kill the magical bird, but this time he captures it with an elaborate cage mechanism (that must go down in history as one of the luckiest shots EVER), drinks its blood and becomes invulnerable! Now raise your hand if you knew it worked like that.

City of Angels also included a subtle subplot regarding the hero's failure, making the ending rather bittersweet. This subplot was so subtle, however, that nobody ever caught it. You have to listen to the commentaries in the DVD to learn that The Crow is only free to perform his grisly business on Earth, and no longer. If he grows too attached to mortal life (say, because of Halo 2), then he can never go to his eternal reward in Heaven. Thou shalt not kill unless a mystical bird doth command it. So at the end of the film, The Crow has actually out-stayed his welcome when he went to rescue his captured girlfriend. It turns out that the villain, Judah, really didn't have anything to do with the hero's murder, and so his death wasn't technically "sanctioned." This is all very technical, full of loopholes, and it would have been really nice if there was a single line of dialogue anywhere in the movie that hinted at this hidden layer of depth. What are we supposed to do, divine this info with a Ouija board?

"You're a funny guy! I'll kill you last."

The Crow: Salvation

At this point, most people realized that the Crow franchise died with Brandon Lee, but Miramax kept churning out sequels to the direct-to-video market. Salvation, to its credit, did take the story in a new direction and took some refreshing liberties with the Crow character. In this story, Eric Mabius plays Alex Corvis, a man on death row for the murder of his girlfriend. He didn't do it, of course, but the crooked cops responsible have put him on the fast track to the electric chair. Instead of wearing the white clown makeup and black eyeshadow, Corvis' trademark Crow colors are burned into his face from the execution mask. This time, Corvis' mission isn't so clear in his own mind, and he sets out to discover for himself who killed his girlfriend and framed him. After he scores some White Castles, of course; prison food sucks.

Salvation is surprisingly good, especially for a critic like me who watches DTV sequels with low expectations, and Crow sequels doubly so. Fans will dig the original story, the decent soundtrack, and the ensemble cast that includes Kirsten Dunst in a forgotten role. The last act is a little strange, and the script seems to rely overmuch on the hero's discovery of a severed arm. Still, it does take steps to address the rules for The Crow's existence, and even offers a "gotcha" moment for snarky critics who expect the bird to die in every film.

The Crow: Wicked Prayer

Let's say you're a movie producer. You manage to strike solid gold when David Boreanaz from TV's Angel agrees to appear in your new Crow movie. We're talking about a physically-fit, sexy beefcake of a man with martial arts training and some real acting chops. He's absolutely perfect for the role of The Crow, so of course the makers of Wicked Prayer decided to put Boreanaz in the role of a scenery-chewing spaz villain Luc Crash. Who did they decide to don the whiteface? None other than Edward Furlong, better known as "the kid from Terminator 2: Judgment Day." He's a decent enough actor, but why in the name of all that's holy didn't they cast Angel in the role? Poor casting alone is enough to kill this movie. Furlong simply isn't physically imposing. His makeup, costuming, and hairstyle are all terrible, and he looks exactly like Winona Ryder. What's worse is that Furlong doesn't exactly have a lot of bass in his voice, and while he's adventuring as The Crow, he still has a squeaky nasal tone that makes you want to dump his books and stuff him in a locker.

Oooh she just looks like she'll HARM me!

Other notable acquisitions are Danny Trejo, a fine Latino actor here cast as an American Indian (a decision that's borderline offensive considering they're very distinct cultures) and Dennis Hopper himself. I'll get to Dennis in a minute. Boreanaz's character is named Luc Crash for the sole reason that his co-star Tara Reid is named Lola Byrne, which sets up the inevitable eye-rollingly bad "Crash & Byrne" joke down the line. That's right, Tara "Frankenboobs" Reid is in this movie, and she left her talent in her other implants. Any moment with Reid on screen is only slightly less-painful than having bamboo shoots shoved under your fingernails. I don't really remember much about her performance, because any time she appeared I started slapping myself to block out the agony, and I thought I might never stop.

Which one is Tara Reid?

The artistic conceit for this picture is to relocate the setting to the deserts of the American southwest, and to pit The Crow against the Four Horsemen. Not the Biblical Four Horsemen, or even WCW's Four Horsemen with Chris Benoit, Arn Anderson, Ric Flair, and Tully Blanchard. That would be awesome. In Wicked Prayer, the Four Horsemen are a gang of Dusty People who think a shower is scrubbing one's armpits with a damp paper towel in the bathroom of a Texaco. This is how the Horsemen are introduced to us, and I swear I haven't changed a word:

Pestilence
Occupation: Toxic Waste Removal
Diagnosis: Terminal
Offered: Apologies
Mission: Revenge

Famine
Occupation: Fry Cook
Legal Status: Half Breed
Tribal Status: Rejected
Mission: Revenge

War
Occupation: Mine Demolition
Fatalities: Three Brothers
Compensation: Insufficient
Mission: Revenge

Death
Occupation: Satanic Cult Leader
Motive: Father Killed by an Indian
Mission: Raise Hell... Literally

A fry cook? Chris Benoit could totally take these guys. Luc Crash is "Death," and his villainous plot is to systematically kill people according to his girlfriend's book of witchcraft so he can become Satan. Jimmy Cuervo (Furlong) and his girlfriend are two victims in his path, because his spellbook calls for "the gall bladder of a whiny femme child-star has-been." Dennis Hopper plays a satanic hippie pimp (yes, really) named El Nino (yes, really) who performs the last part of Crash's ritual to become the Devil: a black wedding to Tara Reid. Hopper's performance is so strange, it enters the realm of surreal. Indeed, when the part of a satanic hippie pimp was put forward, the only actor worthy of bringing it to life would be Dennis Hopper, n'est-ce pas? As if the character wasn't colorful enough, El Nino performs his dark rituals while speaking Snoop Dizzle ebonics. Here are some of his lines from the wedding, here immortalized for your enjoyment:

"He'll be your homey now and forever more! I now pronounce you devil and his shorty! Kiss the bride motherf*****! Well, all wicked-ass props to you Mr. O.G. and thanks for representing all the homeys."

Don't worry folks, I'm still working on a way to go back in time so I can terminate the makers of these bad movies! No, there's no need to thank me. I'm just representing all my homeys.

"Anyone for some devil's food cake?"

  • lol
    Of course there's nothing wrong with casting a latino to play an aboriginal role! It's just acting! That's why there would be no problem casting a white dude as a black character because you could just paint him black! Right?
  • Squall Lee
    I only remember hearing about the Crow in High School, when all the Goth kids, poser emo kids, and anyone who thought they were deep or emotional were mentally orgasming all over this movie series.

    I picked it up out of sheer curiosity, honestly got super bored by the 45 minute mark of the first movie.
  • Grayfox
    @ Review:

    The second Crow film's subplot was subtle because it was all but removed by the dumbasses at Miramax, who thought that it was a good idea to rearrange scenes and cut down the film from 120 mintues to 84 (More than 25%. Holy shit.) because (Ironically enough) They were afraid that people wouldn't like it because it wasn't enough like the first film.
  • HerculesInNewYork
    The Crow was originally a graphic novel, with the empahsis on graphic. It was written by a very tormented man (at the time) who lost his girl friend in a car wreck caused by a drunk driver. Eric in the graphic novel loses his girlfriend in much the same way. Her death is sudden, unexpected (by Eric), unlawful, and undeserved. So basically, the author saw the world as a dark, miserable, and unappologetic place. Its not a great graphic novel, there are no endearing characters, but its an interesting look in to the mind of someone whos feels they have lost everything in the world and wants someone to pay for it.

    The movie doesn't delve this deep in to the human psyche. The revenge plot is there, but Eric and his girl friend's death are planned. This isn't a bad thing, however. The movie needed a mastermind/villian that the audience could love to hate, Did it work? In a way, yes. Top Dollar is at least a sort of interesting character, altough a little dumb. Dumb because he wants Detroit to burn; literally, he wants it on fire. The place where he lives and imbezzles money from store owners to make a living for himself ablaze, for what? Anarchy, I guess. It doesn't seem like to solid of a business plan, but he is insane. His girlfriend is his sister, afterall. Anyway, theres a main villian now, a little girl to feel sorry for, and a cop to relate to. Again, this is all needed because most of the audience wouldn't be able to relate to Eric. He's a bit invincible and a little more evil than most of us could imagine being. But still, Compared to the Eric in the comic; the movie Eric is as about as dangerous as a white puffy cloud on a sunny day.

    I think I babled enough and incoherently enough to waste sometime at work. This site saves my mundane day.
  • TexMechx
    I used to love the Crow. I'd stay up and watch it with my Emo friends while i was in High School. I remember being so excited when it came out on tape and i rushed to the store to go and buy it. I'd actually grown up watching some of the movies with Brandon Lee (Rapid Fire, Laser Mission) in them and it was cool seeing the son of Bruce Lee acting and doing a kick ass job at it.

    He had moves, the style, the looks, and a smile that could stop a train. A good looking actor who could not only kick everyone's asses through the roof, but he could act on top of it? No other fighting actor at the time could say the same.

    That being said, without him, the movies really did go south. I watched them because i felt some sort of strange need to do so. As if watching them would be like my own dedication to his memory. But i wish i hadn't.

    After i read this i popped the movie in the old VCR (yes, i still have one... why? Well, because they fucking play movies. Every DVD i have skips at some point and it pisses me off... okay, that and i never went out and bought the DVD) and started watching it. Right away i know that Brandon Lee is the only thing that kept that movie afloat for me.

    So i suppose what i'm trying to say is great review.

    And as far as that last comment...You hit it right on the head OMP. Couldn't have said it better.
  • mightysamurai
    "Your example doesn’t hold the same punch, because in both cases he’s a white European guy."

    And the difference is...?

    Are you saying it's okay for a white-skinned European to play another white-skinned European but it's not okay for a brown-skinned North American to play another brown-skinned North American?

    "You can’t really do the same thing with Latino and Indian culture without looking really insensitive: “Well, they’re both brown, so close enough.”"

    So it's "insensitive" to do it to brown people but it's perfectly all right to do it with white people. Gotcha.
  • OpenMawProductions
    @Faulkon, you're definately not right. Just because Political Correctness wants to play that game doesnt mean we have to as well. If its wrong in one instance, its wrong in both instances. If its not wrong in one instance, it shouldnt wrong in the other instance. Regardless of the "punch" involved.

    Shooting someone or poisoning someone. It's still murder, even if one is subtle.

    Its the same crap as trying to imply that minorities are not capable of racism. They most definately are.

    For the record I have no problem with casting someone of one race to portray another race. Its called "acting" for a reason.

    @Review

    The Crow series always rubbed me the wrong way. I dont know why, I heard of the original over the years, and always had the same reaction. Initially intriqued, but then totally dismissed it. The entire things success is based around a horrible real life event. Much like Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight. There always tends to be over compensation and over-hyping when someone dies during the filming of a film. It really shouldnt have gone past the first one, since it told the story it set out to tell, and that was that.

    Excellent review and retrospective.
  • Faulkon
    mightysamurai: Your example doesn't hold the same punch, because in both cases he's a white European guy. You can't really do the same thing with Latino and Indian culture without looking really insensitive: "Well, they're both brown, so close enough."

    Y'see? Admittedly it's a double standard, but hey, welcome to America, amirite? :)
  • Elihn
    Well, in 'Wicked Prayer', they could've at least chosen a female actress as the 'Crow', since Edward Furlong seemed to be so whiny and uberemotional in that role.
    'Flesh and Blood" has a female main character in it and it works out pretty well, imho.

    I also think that the cast of WP has been proved extremely unfitting (Especially David Boreanaz as the satanic, ridiculous super villain he tries to be.). But that doesn't make the movie that bad. In fact, I liked it more than 'Salvation' though I cannot explain why it is. :/
  • Victor Laube
    The "Crow Wicked Prayer" was so horrible James O'Barr should have it rammed sideways up his poopshoot.
  • paul
    "This subplot was so subtle, however, that nobody ever caught it."
    I read that paragraph 3 times and I don't get it, oh well never gonna watch those movies anyway
  • mightysamurai
    "Other notable acquisitions are Danny Trejo, a fine Latino actor here cast as an American Indian (a decision that's borderline offensive considering they're very distinct cultures)"

    Um, why is that "borderline offensive" exactly? English and German are two distinct cultures but nobody ever says the casting of Alan Rickman as a German terrorist in Die Hard is "borderline offensive".
  • DelVaro
    thanks for the new reviews and especialy this one. i was waiting for them and this one kicks ass
  • Arkon
    You forgot to mention that one of the reasons the first movie made so much money was the death of Brandon Lee during the filming.
  • johnnyfog
    WHAT? Angel could've been the Crow?
    Man, I fuckin dug Angel when it was on. Don't get me wrong, Joss Whedon can eat pig rectums, but that show was solid. Boreanaz has a cool name too. BOREANAZ. I probably spelled it wrong, but eh.

    He got a little beefcake in season 5 though. Good thing it ended when it did.
  • DoktorJazz
    Only good part of these movies was Iggy Pop in the second one. Seriously, Iggy pop makes everything better
  • Rachel
    Thank you so much for putting this review up, I actually have been waiting for it for sometime. I am a long time fan of the first Crow movie and comic, the other movies while I found to be somewhat entertaining could not live up to the first.
blog comments powered by Disqus